JMIR Infodemiology

Youths are increasingly turning to TikTok for mental health information, making the platform an important space where young people encounter portrayals of mental illness. While such visibility can raise awareness, reduce stigma, and make young people feel more connected and understood in their experiences, concerns have been raised about the diagnostic accuracy of this content, which is often produced by nonprofessionals and presented using emotionally appealing stylistic features. Although prior research has examined mental health content on TikTok broadly, little is known about how depression-related symptoms are portrayed by creators on the platform.

Neurodevelopmental disorders, especially attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), have seen a marked rise in public attention, yet research on public opinion remains limited. Social media analysis offers real-time, unfiltered insights into public perceptions, enabling empirical examination of public attitudes and opinions.

Nearly 1 in 4 young adults has a chronic condition, yet many feel well despite their diagnosis. Asymptomatic conditions such as prediabetes and hypertension create a unique vulnerability to digital health misinformation, particularly on platforms where inaccurate content is prevalent. Conventional clinical responses, which often just warn patients about online misinformation, fail to address the underlying drivers of this behavior. This viewpoint proposes a novel disease characteristic–based vulnerability framework to understand this challenge, grounded in established behavioral science theories such as the capability, opportunity, and motivation–behavior model; temporal discounting; and the concept of information voids in infodemiology. We identify a critical “information void” for asymptomatic conditions managed primarily through lifestyle modification. This void, created by the absence of symptomatic feedback combined with delayed clinical biomarker feedback, compels patients to seek information online. Instead of viewing this information seeking as a problematic deviation, we reframe it as a “digital phenotype” indicating a patient’s readiness for behavior change. Through case studies illustrating how this framework applies to specific conditions (prediabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and untreated hypertension), we demonstrate its practical utility for clinicians, health systems, and policymakers. Evidence supports a multipronged approach: integrating digital health literacy into clinical encounters, providing curated evidence-based resources, and pursuing strategic institutional engagement in digital spaces. While acknowledging the framework’s deliberate simplification and the need for culturally sensitive adaptation across diverse health care settings, this viewpoint offers a generalizable strategy for engaging with patients’ information needs, helping transform a public health challenge into an opportunity for empowerment.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains one of the world’s deadliest infectious diseases. Yet, despite the growing role of online health communities (OHCs) as key sources of social support, research on TB-related online communities remains scarce. Network analysis has been increasingly used to study OHCs and identify opinion leaders (OLs), offering a valuable approach to advancing knowledge about TB-related online communities.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the challenges posed by the rapid spread of misinformation and disinformation, exacerbating societal polarization and institutional distrust. Understanding how misinformation and disinformation is understood and framed in public discourse is essential to developing strategies for building societal resilience and promoting informed decision-making during crises.

As the prospect of an HIV vaccine nears reality, understanding public discourse around the vaccine is essential for informing communication strategies and addressing misinformation. Social media platforms are influential spaces where public narratives form, yet little research has examined discourse around an HIV vaccine, especially on TikTok.

Scientific misinformation remains a major barrier to effective health communication. Bridging the gap between academic research and public understanding requires tools that simplify scientific language and adapt content to diverse audiences.

The sugar market in Indonesia reflects the distinct consumer behavior shaped by economic and deeply rooted cultural factors. This study explores how symbolic values attached to sugar sustain persistent, often irrational or uncontrollable consumption, highlighting the need for a demand-side perspective in the economic sociology of sugar markets.

Social media has transformed the landscape of health communication. Video content can optimally activate our cognitive systems, enhance learning, and deliver accessible information. Evidence has suggested the positive impact of videos on health knowledge and health-related behaviors, yet the impact of social media videos on quantitative health outcomes is underresearched. Evaluating such outcomes poses unique challenges in measuring exposure and outcomes within internet-based populations.

The illegal use of opioids has emerged as a major global public health concern, contributing to widespread addiction and a growing number of overdose-related deaths. In response, the US federal government has invested billions of dollars in combating the opioid epidemic through treatment, prevention, and law enforcement initiatives. Despite these efforts, there remains an urgent need for automated tools capable of detecting overdose cases and assessing the risk levels of substances—tools that can enable faster, more effective responses with less reliance on human intervention. Social media, particularly Reddit, has become a valuable source of self-reported data on opioid misuse, offering rich insights into user experiences and symptoms.

As TikTok (ByteDance) grows as a major platform for health information, the quality and accuracy of Arabic-language cancer prevention content remain unknown. Limited access to culturally relevant and evidence-based information may exacerbate disparities in cancer knowledge and prevention behaviors. Although large language models offer scalable approaches for analyzing online health content, their utility for short-form video data, especially in underrepresented languages, has not been well established.

Language barriers between Canadian patients and health care providers are associated with poorer health outcomes, including decreased patient safety and quality of care, misdiagnosis and longer treatment initiation times, and increased mortality. However, research exploring language as a social determinant of health is limited, as Canadian health data are scattered across many jurisdictions, each with its own policies and procedures. This fragmentation makes it difficult for researchers to identify, locate, and use existing data. This paper presents the results of a pilot study that attempts to address this gap by creating a metadata repository (MDR) to act as a central source of information about what data are available at which data holdings across Canada.