Accessibility settings

This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Information Demand (62) Ethics, Privacy, and Legal Issues (792) Consumer & Patient Education and Shared-Decision Making (1257) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1973) Information Retrieval (485) Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine (409) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1391) Wikis (20) Pregnancy Information, Education and Lifestyle Interventions (471)

Published on in Vol 4 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/64577, first published .
Woman working on a laptop with a pastry and bokeh lights

Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database

Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database

Authors of this article:

Mackenzie Lemieux1 Author Orcid Image ;   Cyrus Zhou1 Author Orcid Image ;   Caroline Cary1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jeannie Kelly1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (5) Tweetations Metrics

Journals

  1. Leiter V, Delaune G. Intrauterine Devices: Take Up and Discontinuation in a Time of Change. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2025;29(5):724 View
  2. Kam C, Marcellin C. Unwilling to Disclose: Privacy and Pregnancy in Post-Roe America. Public Opinion Quarterly 2026;90(1):152 View
  3. Chiang A, Gariepy A, Leon-Martinez D, Treder K, Schwarz E. Desire for reversal after tubal sterilization in the United States, 2006–2023. F&S Reports 2026;7(2):143 View
  4. Spinaris R, Strait R, Fannin J, DeSanto M, Hale N. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Factors Affecting Motivation to Undergo Vasectomy: Does the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Decision Matter?. Cureus 2026 View

Conference Proceedings

  1. Encarnación R, Jones C, Metaxa D. Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Auditing LLM Responses in a Complex Policy Landscape: Abortion Law in the United States View