This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Infoveillance and Social Listening (214) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1666) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1369) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1050) Quality/Credibility of eHealth Information and Trust Issues (544)

Published on in Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/34525, first published .
Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study

Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study

Factors Affecting Physicians’ Credibility on Twitter When Sharing Health Information: Online Experimental Study

Authors of this article:

DaJuan Ferrell1 Author Orcid Image ;   Celeste Campos-Castillo2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (4) Tweetations (5) Metrics

Journals

  1. Engebretsen M. På YouTube og Instagram i folkehelsas tjeneste. Norsk medietidsskrift 2024;30(4):1 View
  2. Engebretsen M. The role, impact, and responsibilities of health experts on social media. A focus group study with future healthcare workers. Frontiers in Communication 2024;9 View
  3. Zhao Y, Zhang L, Zeng C, Chen Y, Lu W, Song N. Factors influencing online health information credibility: a meta-analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management 2024 View
  4. Galinkala P, Atkinson E, Campos-Castillo C. Age Variation Among US Adults’ Social Media Experiences and Beliefs About Who Is Responsible for Reducing Health-Related Falsehoods: Secondary Analysis of a National Survey. JMIR Aging 2024;7:e56761 View