Published on in Vol 1, No 1 (2021): Jan-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Public Interest and Behavior Change in the United States Regarding Colorectal Cancer Following the Death of Chadwick Boseman: Infodemiology Investigation of Internet Search Trends Nationally and in At-Risk Areas

Public Interest and Behavior Change in the United States Regarding Colorectal Cancer Following the Death of Chadwick Boseman: Infodemiology Investigation of Internet Search Trends Nationally and in At-Risk Areas

Public Interest and Behavior Change in the United States Regarding Colorectal Cancer Following the Death of Chadwick Boseman: Infodemiology Investigation of Internet Search Trends Nationally and in At-Risk Areas

Original Paper

1Office of Medical Student Research, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States

2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States

*all authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Nicholas B Sajjadi, BSc

Office of Medical Student Research

College of Osteopathic Medicine

Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences

1111 W 17th Street

Tulsa, OK, 74107

United States

Phone: 1 9185821972


Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) has the third highest cancer mortality rate in the United States. Enhanced screening has reduced mortality rates; however, certain populations remain at high risk, notably African Americans. Raising awareness among at-risk populations may lead to improved CRC outcomes. The influence of celebrity death and illness is an important driver of public awareness. As such, the death of actor Chadwick Boseman from CRC may have influenced CRC awareness.

Objective: We sought to assess the influence of Chadwick Boseman’s death on public interest in CRC in the United States, evidenced by internet searches, website traffic, and donations to prominent cancer organizations.

Methods: We used an auto-regressive integrated moving average model to forecast Google searching trends for the topic “Colorectal cancer” in the United States. We performed bivariate and multivariable regressions on state-wise CRC incidence rate and percent Black population. We obtained data from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the Colon Cancer Foundation (CCF) for information regarding changes in website traffic and donations.

Results: The expected national relative search volume (RSV) for colorectal cancer was 2.71 (95% CI 1.76-3.66), reflecting a 3590% (95% CI 2632%-5582%) increase compared to the expected values. With multivariable regression, the statewise RSV increased for each percent Black population by 1.09 (SE 0.18, P<.001), with 42% of the variance explained (P<.001). The American Cancer Society reported a 58,000% increase in CRC-related website traffic the weekend following Chadwick Boseman’s death compared to the weekend before. The Colon Cancer Foundation reported a 331% increase in donations and a 144% increase in revenue in the month following Boseman’s death compared to the month prior.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that Chadwick Boseman’s death was associated with substantial increases in awareness of CRC. Increased awareness of CRC may support earlier detection and better prognoses.

JMIR Infodemiology 2021;1(1):e29387



Colorectal cancer (CRC) currently has the third highest mortality rate among cancers in the United States [1]. Implementing enhanced screening, namely by colonoscopy, has led to a significant decline in CRC mortality rates in the older population; [2] however, some populations remain at disproportionately high risk. African Americans have the highest incidence and mortality rates for CRC of any ethnic group; however, they are less likely to receive appropriate screening [3]. Additionally, in 2020, Rogers et al [4] identified regions in the United States that are associated with higher rates of early onset CRC, specifically among African American males, highlighting the need to focus on improving outcomes in this population. Raising awareness of CRC disparity among stakeholders and those at increased risk is a necessary component for achieving improved outcomes.

Infodemiology is the scientific study of distributions, determinants, and characteristics of information in an electronic medium, specifically the internet, or in a population, with the ultimate goal of informing public health and public policy [5]. Infodemiologic frameworks have provided a methodological means of analyzing public interest and awareness of medical conditions [6]. A few established infodemiologic metrics include aggregated data sets revealing patterns of information-seeking or information utility on websites and social media [7], the discourse and discussion found in web-based forums or blogs, and a population’s activities on search engines over time [5,8]. Using infodemiologic metrics for medical research provides a real-time data stream reflecting the dynamics of information prevalence and utility that may be difficult to capture with traditional methodologies. Using infodemiologic methods may allow researchers to gauge the public interest in and awareness of CRC in at-risk populations.

As efforts are needed to raise CRC awareness, the entertainment industry may be well positioned to exert a positive influence on public awareness. The role of celebrity influence in health communications has been well studied by communications researchers, and communications scholarship is a useful source for understanding web-based searching and engagement behaviors related to publicized celebrity health information [9,10]. The influence of celebrity health on the public’s awareness of medical conditions has been expanded upon by medical infodemiology research. In one infodemiologic study, media coverage of public figures disclosing a cancer diagnosis was shown to generate substantial public interest in various types of cancer. For example, large spikes in internet searches for pancreatic cancer were associated with actor Patrick Swayze’s public announcement of his pancreatic cancer diagnosis. Similar spikes were observed when Steve Jobs took medical leave from Apple after being diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Additional large spikes in searches for pancreatic cancer were observed following both of their deaths. In some cases, this coverage led to greater measurable increases in awareness than that of traditional awareness campaigns [11]. Although the study by Kaleem et al [11] examined numerous spikes in interest for many cancers, it did not show isolated peaks for CRC due to paucity of public figures announcing they had colon cancer. The influence of celebrity illness and death from CRC may have important implications for increasing awareness of CRC.

On August 28, 2020, Chadwick Boseman, star of the Marvel movie Black Panther, died at age 43 of colorectal cancer [12]. Boseman’s role in this film helped to normalize African heritage and culture in the United States and is considered to have significant cultural importance in the African American community [13-15]. As Boseman was a prominent figure in the United States and in the African American community, his death presents a unique opportunity to study the influence prominent public figures have on public awareness and behaviors concerning CRC in the United States. Thus, we examined internet searching data before and after Boseman’s death to examine the potential influence on public interest regarding CRC, nationally and in states containing regions at high risk for CRC. Additionally, we contacted the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the Colon Cancer Foundation (CCF) to inquire about differences in website traffic and donation revenue around the time Boseman’s death was disclosed to the public. Findings from this study may strengthen our understanding of the influence that public figures have on public health and may help to raise awareness of CRC among at-risk communities.

Data Sources

Three data sources were used for gauging public interest in CRC surrounding Boseman’s death: Google Trends (GT), Wikipedia, and Twitter. We used Google Trends [16] because it is useful for identifying regional population interests and behaviors regarding medical information [8]. GT is an open database that presents population-based Google search trends over specified time periods, allowing for nearly real-time observation. GT reports regional search volumes for selected topics over time. The relative search volume (RSV) for a topic or search term is represented as a value ranging from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating peak popularity during the designated time frame. As such, GT data may serve as a proxy for the relative interest in or awareness of a given topic in a specific region over a specific time [11]. GT data is a particularly useful tool in the field of oncology, as internet searching for cancer-related topics over time has been shown to significantly correspond with the statewise incidence and mortality rates of certain cancers in the United States, including CRC [17]. On September 13, 2020, we collected national RSV data for the topic colorectal cancer in the United States. We used the date range of June 13 through September 11, 2020, to observe trends prior to, during, and shortly after Boseman’s death, aiming to minimize confounding from any related events.

Additionally, we collected statewise RSV data for the topic colorectal cancer in the United States during the peak interest time. The peak interest time was designated as 1 week before Boseman’s death to 1 week after (August 21 through September 4, 2020) to capture the immediate public response associated with Chadwick Boseman’s death. Data were collected on September 13, 2020, under the “subregion” category for the United States. Each state’s RSV was then paired with its most recently reported CRC incidence rate [18] as well as its percent Black population [19]. Pairing these data allowed us to explore associations between a state’s RSV for colorectal cancer during peak interest with its CRC incidence rate and its percent Black population.

Wikipedia is the most frequently used source for seeking medical information on the internet, and it is therefore a valuable source for assessing public interest in medical topics [20]. We used the Pageviews Analysis [21] tool to acquire the number of visits to the Wikipedia pages for “Colorectal cancer” and “Chadwick Boseman” over the same time period. Pageviews Analysis was used by Brigo et al [22] to provide evidence of associations with celebrity appearances and increased Wikipedia searching that suggested increased public knowledge of multiple sclerosis. Twitter is also a useful source for infodemiologic studies, and it has been used to assess the impact of awareness campaigns and analyze public engagement with medical information [23-26]. Sprout Social [27] was used to acquire the number of tweets containing the text “colon cancer” and “chadwick boseman”. We selected similar terms for Wikipedia and Twitter data to ensure content uniformity across platforms. The temporal trends for Wikipedia and Twitter were worldwide trends and were observed over the same time period as the US national GT data.


With the national GT data, we used an autoregressive integrated moving average [28] (ARIMA) model to forecast the expected relative search volume for colorectal cancer had Boseman’s death from CRC not been publicly disclosed, comparing expected values to observed values. Using the statewise RSV data from the peak interest time, we employed bivariate regression models on the statewise CRC incidence rate and on the percent Black population. We then used multivariable models considering both parameters. We performed statewise regression analysis on all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We then performed a subanalysis on the 19 states shown by Rogers et al [4] to contain so-called CRC hot spots—regions with disproportionately high rates of CRC among African Americans, particularly young African American males.

To explore the behavior change associated with Boseman’s death, we obtained data from the ACS regarding the percent increase in colon cancer–related traffic on their website the weekend following Boseman’s death compared to the weekend prior. We also obtained the number of daily donations received by the CCF and the percent increase in revenue seen 1 month following Boseman’s death compared to the month prior. Additionally, both organizations provided estimates of percent increases in total revenue 1 month following Boseman’s death compared to the same time period in 2019.

All statistical analyses were performed using R, version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) [29]. Statistical significance was defined as P<.05. The Oklahoma State University Center for Health Science Institutional Review Board determined that this project did not qualify as human subject research as defined in 45 CFR 46.102(d) and (f); therefore, it was not subject to further oversight.

The auto.arima function in R established parameters for the ARIMA model to forecast values based on the historical mean RSV. The expected national RSV for colorectal cancer was 2.71 (95% CI 1.76-3.66). The observed peak RSV (100) occurring on August 29, 2020, reflects a 3590% (95% CI 2632%-5582%) increase in national RSV compared to expected values. Large spikes in Wikipedia searches and Twitter keywords were observed during the peak interest time. The GT forecast comparison and temporal trends for Wikipedia and Twitter can be found in Figure 1.

The statewise bivariate regression models for all 50 states and the District of Columbia showed that for each 1 point increase in incidence rate, the RSV would decrease by 0.25 (SE=0.4, P=.53), a nonsignificant finding; however, for each 1% increase in the Black population, the RSV increased by 1.06 (SE=0.18, P<.001). With the multivariable model, the statewise RSV further decreased per point of incidence to –0.47 (SE=0.3, P=.13) and increased for each percent Black population to 1.09 (SE=0.18, P<.001), with 42% of variance explained by the model (P<.001). The coefficients in the subanalysis adjusted model for the 19 states containing hot spot regions were in the same direction, but to a lesser degree, and they accounted for 33% of the variability in RSV (P=.01). Full results of the regression models are displayed in Table 1.

The American Cancer Society reported a 58,000% increase in colon cancer–related website traffic the weekend following Boseman’s death compared to the weekend before. The CCF reported receiving 595 donations from July 29 to August 28, 2020, and 2565 donations from August 28 to September 30, 2020, representing a 331% increase in the number of donations the month following Boseman’s death. The ACS reported a 35.4% increase in total revenue the week following Boseman’s death compared to the same time in 2019, and the CCF reported a nearly 500% increase in total revenue the week following Boseman’s death compared to the same time period in 2019. Additionally, the CCF reported a 144% increase in total revenue the month following Boseman’s death compared to the month prior, and they stated that they anticipated additional daily revenue influx as companies continued to run campaigns on the CCF’s behalf following Boseman’s death.

Figure 1. (A) Relative search volumes for colorectal cancer in the United States before and after Chadwick Boseman’s death on August 28, 2020 (indicated by the asterisk). The expected forecast from the autoregressive integrated moving average model is shown by the red line. (B) The total number of visits (worldwide) to the “Colorectal cancer” and “Chadwick Boseman” Wikipedia pages before and after Chadwick Boseman’s death. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale, with each large tick mark representing an order of magnitude. (C) The number of tweets containing the text “colon cancer” or “chadwick boseman”. The vertical axis is on a logarithmic scale.
View this figure
Table 1. Correlation of relative search volume (RSV) with colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and percent Black population.

All 50 US states and DCaCRC hot spot statesb (n=19)

CoefficientSEP valueR2CoefficientSEP valueR2
Bivariate model

Incidence of CRC–<.01–1.330.39.003c0.38

Percent Black population1.060.18<.0010.400.630.28.040.18
Multivariable model

Incidence of CRC–0.470.300.1320.42–0.560.32.100.33

Percent Black population1.090.18<.0010.420.750.24.0070.33

aDC: District of Columbia.

bStates with hot spot counties: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia.

cItalic text indicates statistical significance.

Principal Findings

Our results suggest that Chadwick Boseman’s death was associated with substantial increases in the national interest in and awareness of CRC in the United States. Although a state’s RSV for colorectal cancer during the peak interest time was not statistically associated with its CRC incidence rate, our results suggest that the RSV for colorectal cancer during peak interest time was significantly associated with a state’s percentage of Black residents. Significant increases in searches for CRC-related topics in states with higher percentages of African American residents suggest that Boseman’s death effectively increased awareness among at-risk populations. This is an important finding given that Rogers et al [4] found young (ages 20-49) non-Hispanic Black men to have the lowest early onset CRC survival rates among all ethnic groups in 232 hot spot counties—one of which is Anderson County, South Carolina, Boseman’s birthplace and home county. Numerous studies have shown that raising awareness of factors for heightened risk of CRC corresponds with increased willingness to undergo CRC screening procedures and improved attitudes toward CRC [30-32]. Increased interest in and awareness of CRC among at-risk populations, namely African Americans, may lead to earlier detections and better prognoses. The RSVs for colorectal cancer can be visualized in Figure 2. For comparison, we have included a US map showing the African American population density by state population for comparison [33].

Figure 2. (Top) RSV on Google Trends for the term colorectal cancer during peak interest surrounding the death of Chadwick Boseman. (Bottom) Percentage of Americans who identified as Black/African American on the 2015 American Community Survey [33]. CRC: colorectal cancer; RSV: relative search volume.
View this figure

The spikes in Wikipedia searches for colorectal cancer and in tweets containing “colorectal cancer” coinciding with Boseman’s death were the all-time largest recorded volumes for their respective platforms, putting into perspective the massive magnitude of increased searching for CRC topics following Boseman’s death. Boseman’s death was announced on his personal Twitter account shortly after his death from CRC, and the announcement is now the single most “liked” tweet in Twitter history [34]. Our findings support the use of Wikipedia and Twitter data as reliable indicators of public interest resulting from public disclosure of celebrity illness and necessitate further exploration of these platforms as research tools.

We found substantial increases in website traffic and donations to two prominent cancer organizations following Boseman’s death, suggesting increased public financial support of CRC research and awareness campaigns. Although these findings represent website traffic and donation behavior over a short period of time, they are compelling and promising. Chadwick Boseman’s death may serve as a catalyst toward increasing public awareness of CRC, leading to increased financial support for CRC research and awareness campaigns. Increasing CRC research funding is necessary, as it is disproportionately underfunded [35]. In 2015, CRC caused 50,620 deaths and received US $18 million in funding from non-profits, whereas breast cancer caused 41,070 deaths and received US $460 million [36]. Funding from the National Cancer Institute was similarly distributed [35,37]. Long-term improvements in health outcomes are best supported by policy, evidence-based medicine, and public health initiatives; however, events such as Boseman’s death have the potential to overcome cultural and societal barriers to positive health behavior in ways that the aforementioned factors cannot.

As mentioned previously, communications research [9,10] and infodemiologic GT studies have demonstrated the significant impact public figures can have on the public’s awareness of various medical conditions. Importantly, we assert that increased awareness not resulting in measurable positive behavior change is, while still admirable and necessary, only a partial victory. Until recently, the impact of a public figure’s disclosure of illness regarding CRC was unknown. In line with our own findings, one recently published study by Naik et al [38] examined internet search interests in CRC-related topics following Chadwick Boseman’s death and found increases in searches on Google and Wikipedia comparable to our own. Moreover, the study found proportionally higher increases among areas with higher proportions of Black Americans, a novel and important finding that should be used to increase CRC education among this at-risk community. Further, novel components within our study include additional infodemiologic parameters (Twitter) to measure increased interest and awareness, showing significant increases in activity and the inclusion of data from the ACS and the CCF demonstrating increased donations following Boseman’s death. Our study complements that by Naik et al [38] and suggests positive behavior changes regarding CRC following Boseman’s death. Together, these findings contribute to the international literature base by providing evidence of positive associated behavior change that goes beyond increased internet searching, awareness, or interest following the death of the actor. Further research regarding the direct impact of Chadwick Boseman’s death on CRC screenings and attitudes toward CRC screening among African Americans is warranted, as it cannot be assessed herein.

Strengths and Limitations

Our study has several strengths. To our knowledge, our study is the first of its kind to provide evidence of positive behavior change in the form of donations associated with Chadwick Boseman’s death. Our methodology was adapted from published literature that used GT and ARIMA models to provide evidence for increased awareness of suicide prevention resources following a nationally publicized event [39]. The data provided by the ACS and CCF reflect increases in public interest and support for CRC research, possibly related to Boseman’s death, and these data are unique to our study. Limitations of this study include the limited time frame for observing RSV, website traffic and donations, use of few search terms, and lack of access to donation data entailing actual dollar amounts. The limited observation period limits the generalizability of our findings to the time periods in which we searched, and the long-term influence of Boseman’s death cannot be ascertained from our findings. It is also not possible to make causal claims based on our data, and our results should be interpreted accordingly. Other events could have influenced our outcomes; thus, the potential for confounding factors is present.


National public interest in colorectal cancer substantially increased relative to predicted values following Chadwick Boseman's death. A state’s RSV for colorectal cancer immediately surrounding Boseman’s death was significantly associated with its percentage of Black residents, possibly suggesting increased CRC awareness among this population. Increased interest among at-risk populations associated with Chadwick Boseman’s death may lead to improved health outcomes and attitudes regarding CRC. Website traffic and revenue to prominent cancer organizations increased following Chadwick Boseman’s death. Increased public awareness of CRC associated with Chadwick Boseman’s death may lead to increased support for CRC research and awareness campaigns.


We would like to thank Benjamin Heigle for his valuable contributions to the composition of this study, his technical editing, and his dedication to research. We would like to thank the American Cancer Society for providing their website traffic and revenue statistics for use in this study. We would also like to thank the Colon Cancer Foundation for their time and cooperation, as well as for contributing their donation numbers and revenue data to this study. No funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

MV reports receipt of funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the US Office of Research Integrity, and the Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology, and internal grants from Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences—all outside of the present work.

  1. Cancer facts and figures.   URL: https:/​/www.​​research/​cancer-facts-statistics/​all-cancer-facts-figures/​cancer-facts-figures-2020.​html [accessed 2020-09-30]
  2. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, Miller KD, Ma J, Rosenberg PS, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst 2017 Aug 01;109(8) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Warren Andersen S, Blot WJ, Lipworth L, Steinwandel M, Murff HJ, Zheng W. Association of race and socioeconomic status with colorectal cancer screening, colorectal cancer risk, and mortality in southern US adults. JAMA Netw Open 2019 Dec 02;2(12):e1917995 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Rogers CR, Moore JX, Qeadan F, Gu LY, Huntington MS, Holowatyj AN. Examining factors underlying geographic disparities in early-onset colorectal cancer survival among men in the United States. Am J Cancer Res 2020;10(5):1592-1607 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  5. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. J Med Internet Res 2009 Mar 27;11(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology and infoveillance tracking online health information and cyberbehavior for public health. Am J Prev Med 2011 May;40(5 Suppl 2):S154-S158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Bernardo TM, Rajic A, Young I, Robiadek K, Pham MT, Funk JA. Scoping review on search queries and social media for disease surveillance: a chronology of innovation. J Med Internet Res 2013 Jul 18;15(7):e147 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Mavragani A, Ochoa G. Google Trends in infodemiology and infoveillance: methodology framework. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2019 May 29;5(2):e13439 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Kosenko KA, Binder AR, Hurley R. Celebrity influence and identification: a test of the Angelina Effect. J Health Commun 2016;21(3):318-326. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Kresovich A, Noar SM. The power of celebrity health events: meta-analysis of the relationship between audience involvement and behavioral intentions. J Health Commun 2020 Jun 02;25(6):501-513. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Kaleem T, Malouff TD, Stross WC, Waddle MR, Miller DH, Seymour AL, et al. Google search trends in oncology and the impact of celebrity cancer awareness. Cureus 2019 Aug 10;11(8):e5360 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Ugwu R, Levenson M. Black Panther star Chadwick Boseman dies of cancer at 43. The New York Times. 2020 Aug 29.   URL: [accessed 2021-02-24]
  13. King S. Black Panther is one of the most important cultural moments in American history. Medium. 2018.   URL: https:/​/medium.​com/​@ShaunKing/​black-panther-is-one-of-the-most-important-moments-in-american-history-1fc9166a0972 [accessed 2020-10-01]
  14. Smith J. The revolutionary power of Black Panther. Time.   URL: [accessed 2021-02-24]
  15. Manish PA. Chadwick Boseman 'was a real-life black superhero'. BBC.   URL: [accessed 2021-02-24]
  16. Google Trends.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-13]
  17. Wehner MR, Nead KT. Can Google help us fight cancer? Lancet Oncol 2018 Jul;19(7):867. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. United States Cancer Statistics: Data Visualizations. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-13]
  19. State population by race, ethnicity data. Governing.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-12]
  20. Smith DA. Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: a scoping review. PLoS One 2020;15(2):e0228786 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Pageviews Analysis.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-13]
  22. Brigo F, Lattanzi S, Bragazzi N, Nardone R, Moccia M, Lavorgna L. Why do people search Wikipedia for information on multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler Relat Disord 2018 Feb;20:210-214. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Lyles CR, López A, Pasick R, Sarkar U. "5 mins of uncomfyness is better than dealing with cancer 4 a lifetime": an exploratory qualitative analysis of cervical and breast cancer screening dialogue on Twitter. J Cancer Educ 2013 Mar;28(1):127-133. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Viguria I, Alvarez-Mon MA, Llavero-Valero M, Asunsolo Del Barco A, Ortuño F, Alvarez-Mon M. Eating disorder awareness campaigns: thematic and quantitative analysis using Twitter. J Med Internet Res 2020 Jul 14;22(7):e17626 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Robinson P, Turk D, Jilka S, Cella M. Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2019 Jan;54(1):51-58. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Berry N, Lobban F, Belousov M, Emsley R, Nenadic G, Bucci S. #WhyWeTweetMH: understanding why people use Twitter to discuss mental health problems. J Med Internet Res 2017 Apr 05;19(4):e107 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Sprout Social: social media management solutions.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-13]
  28. Hyndman RJ, Khandakar Y. Automatic time series forecasting: the forecast package for R. J. Stat. Soft 2008;27(3):N/A. [CrossRef]
  29. Ripley B. The R project in statistical computing. MSOR Connections: The Newsletter of the LTSN Maths. 2001.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-13]
  30. Knudsen MD, Hoff G, Tidemann-Andersen I, Bodin GE, Øvervold S, Berstad P. Public awareness and perceptions of colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional survey. J Cancer Educ 2020 Feb 28:N/A. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. McCaffery K, Wardle J, Waller J. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. Prev Med 2003 May;36(5):525-535. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Gimeno-García AZ, Quintero E, Nicolás-Pérez D, Jiménez-Sosa A. Public awareness of colorectal cancer and screening in a Spanish population. Public Health 2011 Sep;125(9):609-615. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. American Community Survey (ACS). US Census Bureau.   URL: [accessed 2021-08-10]
  34. Most liked Tweet ever. A tribute fit for a King. #WakandaForever. @Twitter. 2020 Aug 29.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-30]
  35. Carter AJ, Nguyen CN. A comparison of cancer burden and research spending reveals discrepancies in the distribution of research funding. BMC Public Health 2012 Jul 17;12(1):N/A. [CrossRef]
  36. Kamath SD, Kircher SM, Benson AB. Comparison of cancer burden and nonprofit organization funding reveals disparities in funding across cancer types. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019 Jul 01;17(7):849-854. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Funding for research areas. National Cancer Institute.   URL: [accessed 2020-09-16]
  38. Naik H, Johnson MDD, Johnson MR. Internet interest in colon cancer following the death of Chadwick Boseman: infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res 2021 Jun 15;23(6):e27052 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Torgerson T, Khojasteh J, Vassar M. Public awareness for a sexual assault hotline following a Grey's Anatomy episode. JAMA Intern Med 2020 Mar 01;180(3):456-458 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

ACS: American Cancer Society
ARIMA: autoregressive integrated moving average
CCF: Colon Cancer Foundation
CRC: colorectal cancer
GT: Google Trends
RSV: relative search volume

Edited by C Baur; submitted 05.04.21; peer-reviewed by A Mavragani, S Kardes; comments to author 10.05.21; revised version received 29.06.21; accepted 09.08.21; published 26.08.21


©Nicholas B Sajjadi, Kaylea Feldman, Samuel Shepard, Arjun K Reddy, Trevor Torgerson, Micah Hartwell, Matt Vassar. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (, 26.08.2021.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.