This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Health and Risk Communication (46) Mass Media/Social Media Communication and Campaigns (466) JMIR Theme Issue: COVID-19 Special Issue (2461) Medicine 2.0: Social Media, Open, Participatory, Collaborative Medicine (1666) Infodemiology and Infoveillance (1369) Infoveillance, Infodemiology, Digital Disease Surveillance, Infodemic Management (1050)

Published on in Vol 3 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43685, first published .
Content and User Engagement of Health-Related Behavior Tweets Posted by Mass Media Outlets From Spain and the United States Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Infodemiology Study

Content and User Engagement of Health-Related Behavior Tweets Posted by Mass Media Outlets From Spain and the United States Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Infodemiology Study

Content and User Engagement of Health-Related Behavior Tweets Posted by Mass Media Outlets From Spain and the United States Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Infodemiology Study

Authors of this article:

Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Victor Pereira-Sanchez4 Author Orcid Image ;   Elizabeth R Hooker5, 6 Author Orcid Image ;   Facundo Sanchez7, 8 Author Orcid Image ;   Melchor Alvarez-Mon1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Alan R Teo5, 9 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (1) Tweetations (7) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcala, Alcala de Henares, Spain

    2Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain

    3Ramón y Cajal Institute of Sanitary Research (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain

    4Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States

    5VA Portland Health Care System, Health Services Research & Development Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Portland, OR, United States

    6OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States

    7Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center, New York, NY, United States

    8Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR, United States

    9Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States

    Corresponding Author:

    Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, MD, PhD

    Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties

    Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences

    University of Alcala

    Campus Universitario – C/ 19, Av de Madrid, Km 33,600.

    Alcala de Henares, 28871

    Spain

    Phone: 34 918854505

    Email: maalvarezdemon@icloud.com


    Background: During the early pandemic, there was substantial variation in public and government responses to COVID-19 in Europe and the United States. Mass media are a vital source of health information and news, frequently disseminating this information through social media, and may influence public and policy responses to the pandemic.

    Objective: This study aims to describe the extent to which major media outlets in the United States and Spain tweeted about health-related behaviors (HRBs) relevant to COVID-19, compare the tweeting patterns between media outlets of both countries, and determine user engagement in response to these tweets.

    Methods: We investigated tweets posted by 30 major media outlets (n=17, 57% from Spain and n=13, 43% from the United States) between December 1, 2019 and May 31, 2020, which included keywords related to HRBs relevant to COVID-19. We classified tweets into 6 categories: mask-wearing, physical distancing, handwashing, quarantine or confinement, disinfecting objects, or multiple HRBs (any combination of the prior HRB categories). Additionally, we assessed the likes and retweets generated by each tweet. Poisson regression analyses compared the average predicted number of likes and retweets between the different HRB categories and between countries.

    Results: Of 50,415 tweets initially collected, 8552 contained content associated with an HRB relevant to COVID-19. Of these, 600 were randomly chosen for training, and 2351 tweets were randomly selected for manual content analysis. Of the 2351 COVID-19–related tweets included in the content analysis, 62.91% (1479/2351) mentioned at least one HRB. The proportion of COVID-19 tweets mentioning at least one HRB differed significantly between countries (P=.006). Quarantine or confinement was mentioned in nearly half of all the HRB tweets in both countries. In contrast, the least frequently mentioned HRBs were disinfecting objects in Spain 6.9% (56/809) and handwashing in the United States 9.1% (61/670). For tweets from the United States mentioning at least one HRB, disinfecting objects had the highest median likes and retweets, whereas mask-wearing– and handwashing-related tweets achieved the highest median number of likes in Spain. Tweets from Spain that mentioned social distancing or disinfecting objects had a significantly lower predicted count of likes compared with tweets mentioning a different HRB (P=.02 and P=.01, respectively). Tweets from the United States that mentioned quarantine or confinement or disinfecting objects had a significantly lower predicted number of likes compared with tweets mentioning a different HRB (P<.001), whereas mask- and handwashing-related tweets had a significantly greater predicted number of likes (P=.04 and P=.02, respectively).

    Conclusions: The type of HRB content and engagement with media outlet tweets varied between Spain and the United States early in the pandemic. However, content related to quarantine or confinement and engagement with handwashing was relatively high in both countries.

    JMIR Infodemiology 2023;3:e43685

    doi:10.2196/43685

    Keywords

    COVID-19; health communication; social media; Twitter; health promotion; public health; mass media 


    Harnessing Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been beneficial [1,2]. In previous disasters (eg, H1N1 outbreak), Twitter was among the most used social platforms [3-5]. Mass media outlets are a key tool during disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic because they can educate people [6]. Through Twitter alone, millions of users interact each day, and during disasters the number of interactions and tweets increases [7]. Tweets during disasters can inform the public of risk factors, where to ask for help, locations and availability of hospitals, and locations of people who need help (eg, elderly living alone) [8]. If media outlets share accurate and valuable information (eg, encourage people to stay at home) through Twitter, they may contribute to saving lives [9]. Mass media outlet Twitter accounts can become an excellent resource for the public to stay updated on health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic [10].

    Some behavioral measures, such as handwashing, mask-wearing, and physical distancing, are among the most effective tools to combat the COVID-19 pandemic [11,12]. These are considered preventive health behaviors. The World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and many other health institutions have addressed their importance in slowing the spread of the coronavirus. Furthermore, shelter in place (stay-at-home orders for the general population), quarantine (separation and restriction of movements of people who have potentially been exposed to COVID-19), and isolation (separation of people who have been diagnosed from people who are not sick) have been mandatory in many countries around the world.

    Social media can be used to create indicators of the health environment that are associated with area-level mortality and health behaviors [13,14]. Local area characteristics are increasingly associated with health outcomes. Social processes affect health through the maintenance of social norms, stimulation of new interests, and the dispersal of knowledge. Therefore, comparing Twitter posts from different countries might explain certain differences found among them with regard to responding to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Assessing health-related behaviors (HRBs) on Twitter can help us understand the degree of awareness of the population using these preventive measures. It has been shown that there is an association between the characteristics of the content published in a certain geographic area and the rates of obesity and diabetes mellitus in that area [15]. In fact, a study showed that areas with the most tweets about physical activity or healthy foods (fruits, vegetables, etc) had lower obesity rates [16]. Twitter posts have also been analyzed to track behaviors related to the transmission of infectious diseases such as HIV [17]. Currently, multiple researchers are applying this methodology to better understand the reactions of the population, as well as raise awareness and promote compliance with health measures [18].

    We conducted an observational retrospective study analyzing the content of mass media outlets posted on Twitter referring to COVID-19 during the early pandemic. Using Twitter, we sought to analyze the content posted by 30 major media outlets (17 from Spain and 13 from the United States) about COVID-19 during the first 6 months of the pandemic. Our two primary research aims were to (1) describe the extent to which major media outlets in the United States and Spain have tweeted about COVID-19 HRBs and determine if differences exist between major media outlets in the 2 countries and (2) determine the extent of user engagement in response to tweets about HRBs. We aimed to incorporate a cross-cultural perspective for several reasons. First, we sought to assess whether the media in Spain exhibited communication patterns similar to those in the United States. Furthermore, our hypothesis is that the beliefs and practices related to health may differ between the 2 countries because of political or cultural factors (such as differences in the health care system). In addition, the demographic characteristics of each country vary significantly, which can affect how the population experiences the pandemic. In Spain, a larger percentage of the population resides in multi-unit buildings where shared spaces are common, whereas individual houses are more prevalent in the United States.


    Study Design and Overview

    In this observational infodemiology study, we used concurrent collection and analysis of qualitative and quantitative data from tweets concerning public health measures relevant to the prevention and mitigation of the spread of the novel coronavirus posted by major media outlets in Spain and the United States.

    Data Collection

    Tweets were drawn from a total of 30 major media outlets: 17 from Spain (Antena 3, La Sexta, TVE, Telecinco, cadena SER, cadena COPE, Onda Cero, ABC, El Pais, El Mundo, Europa Press, Noticias Cuatro, EFE, El Diario, La Vanguardia, Público, and Info Libre) and 13 from the United States (New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, USA Today, The Chicago Tribune, New York Post, Wall Street Journal, Boston Globe, San Francisco Chronicle, MSNBC, CNN, ABC News, and CBS News). The 30 media outlets that we selected were general, had national coverage, had a large audience, and were among those with the highest social influence in their respective countries. We included different modalities, such as radio, newspapers, and television, to be more representative.

    Our data collection strategy focused on identifying original tweets related to 4 HRBs: mask-wearing, physical distancing, quarantine or confinement, and hygiene. We included all original tweets posted from the Twitter accounts of the previously mentioned media outlets, thus avoiding the collection of tweets posted by other users, even if they were retweeted or mentioned by these media outlets, that referred to coronavirus (#corona, #coronavirus, #covid-19, #SARS-CoV2, and #2019-nCoV) and contained at least one of the following keywords (or their Spanish equivalents): #handwashing, #selfquarentine, #socialdistancing, #selfisolation, #masking, #mask, #disinfect, #disinfection, #socialgatherings, #sneez, #cough, #physical distancing, #facemask, #facecovering, #clothface, #lavadodemanos, #estornudo, #tos, #cuarentena, #distanciasocial, #distanciafísica, #aislamiento, #desinfectar, #desinfección, and #mascarilla. Original tweets posted between December 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020, were included, and data were collected on May 31, 2020. For each tweet, we extracted text, date, permanent link, and metadata. In addition, we collected user information for each of the media outlets, such as the number of followers and tweets posted with the mentioned hashtags. Finally, we extracted the number of likes and retweets generated by each tweet [19].

    Data Processing and Content Analysis

    As described in our previous studies involving Twitter content analysis, our search tool Tweet Binder [20] allows access to 100% of all public tweets that match the search criteria (query). In contrast, other search engines based on Twitter’s free application programming interface (API) can only access a small sample [21,22]. Tweet Binder has its own data collection system that gathers all publicly available tweets on Twitter and retrieves both tweets and user information from Twitter’s API. Initially, the search tool scans the public section of Twitter to collect the IDs of tweets that match the search query. Subsequently, a call is made to the Twitter API to retrieve the tweet and user information. It does not directly access Twitter firehose itself.

    Figure 1 summarizes the data collection and analysis steps, along with the number of tweets included and excluded in each step. First, we created a codebook based on our research question. There were 2 primary coders (MAA-M and FS). Coders first used a data set of 600 tweets to explore the content, generate codes, and obtain training. Discrepancies were discussed in regular team meetings. Training for coders was provided by the research team members (VPS and ART) experienced in content analysis and codebook development. After training, coders continued coding using the analytic data set. Interrater reliability was examined periodically to prevent rater drift. In a subset of 300 tweets, the interrater reliability averaged 91.7% (275/300) agreement for Spanish tweets and 83.3% (250/300) agreement for English tweets for different categories. The final codebook comprised six categories of HRB: (1) mask-wearing, (2) physical distancing, (3) handwashing, (4) quarantine or confinement, (5) disinfecting objects, and (6) multiple HRBs (any combination of the prior HRB categories). Examples of tweets are listed in Table 1.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Flowchart.
    Table 1. Examples of tweets of each health-related behavior (HRB). Tweets that mentioned >1 HRB were included in the Multiple HRBs category. Usernames and personal names were removed. All tweets reported here are in English (tweets in Spanish have been translated).
    HRBExamples of tweets
    Quarantine or confinement
    • “Twitter is the first major U.S. corporation to strongly encourage its employees to work from home to avoid spreading coronavirus. ‘Beginning today, we are strongly encouraging all employees globally to work from home if they’re able.”
    • “In R.I., 26 people have quarantined themselves while being monitored for coronavirus.”
    • “Students and staff at a Winnetka school are being told to self-quarantine for 14 days, after a 7th-grader was diagnosed with a “probable” case of COVID-19.”
    • “Olympic rugby player arrested after allegedly breaking Fiji’s coronavirus quarantine.”
    Mask-wearing
    • “Globetrotting influencers combatting coronavirus with designer face masks.”
    • “Fashion brands are making face masks, medical gowns for the coronavirus crisis.”
    • “Woman wearing face mask attacked in possible coronavirus hate crime.”
    • “Your hoarding masks could cost me my life—a doctor’s view from the coronavirus front lines.”
    Social distancing
    • “DINING AT A DISTANCE: A Swedish couple has opened a ‘COVID-safe’ restaurant, with one table and one chair located in the middle of a meadow.”
    • “Chicago-area Catholic churches are changing Mass practices to reduce risk of spreading coronavirus. Parishioners are being asked to avoid shaking hands during the Sign of Peace, using holy-water fonts or drinking communion wine.”
    • “Despite state orders to social distance to prevent spread of coronavirus, many funerals in the ultra-Orthodox Jewish communities in Brooklyn continue to be large-scale events, prompting concern from leaders.”
    Handwashing
    • “’Focus on slowing down the spread of COVID-19, the coronavirus. Did I mention: Wash. Your. Hands. Then wash them again,’ says epidemiologist Malia Jones.”
    • “The best protection against coronavirus is washing your hands—but you have to do it properly: Wet your hands. Lather, making sure to get soap in all the nooks and crannies. Scrub for 20 seconds. Rinse and dry thoroughly.”
    • “Coronavirus spawns viral TikTok dance about washing your hands.”
    Disinfecting objects
    • “EPA releases list of disinfectant products approved for use against COVID-19 on surfaces-including multiple products from brands such as Clorox and Lysol.”
    • “The Moscow Metro adopts stricter measures for disinfecting trains, as around 6000 metro carriages are being sterilized with UV light and disinfectant. The city is also starting construction on an infectious diseases hospital amid the coronavirus pandemic.”
    • “Public spaces and elderly people’s homes sprayed with disinfectant by members of Spanish military as nation fights coronavirus pandemic.”
    Multiple HRBs
    • “Cambridge is sending out ‘sound trucks’ to remind residents to stay 6 feet apart and wear masks during coronavirus pandemic.”
    • “AHEAD: @[user] joins @[user] live to discuss how she turned her hit song ‘Get On Your Feet’ into a powerful message about wearing masks and staying home. Plus, why she’s bringing attention to minority communities disproportionately impacted by #coronavirus.”
    • “People in many parts of the world are being asked to avoid crowds, limit travel and even work from home to help limit the spread of novel coronavirus, and satellite images suggest they’re heeding that advice.”

    Ethical Considerations

    This study was initially reviewed by the Oregon Health & Science University Research Integrity Office and the institutional review board and was determined not to involve human participants. This study was approved to be conducted without continued institutional review board oversight and was compliant with the research ethics principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (7th revision, 2013).

    Statistical Analysis

    First, we examined the prevalence of tweets with each HRB among tweets with at least one HRB by country, with P<.05 indicating a statistically significant difference in the proportion of a specific HRB in Spanish compared with US media sources. All further analyses were stratified by country, with Spain and the United States examined independently. Next, we calculated the measures of central tendency of the number of likes and retweets by HRB type. We assessed the distributions of the outcomes by tweet category and country, including calculating measures of central tendency and generating visualizations, such as histograms. The results showed substantial right skew for both the number of likes and retweets; thus, we presented the median (IQR) rather than mean (SD) and chose a Poisson distribution for our regression models.

    Poisson mixed-effects regression models were run both unadjusted and with adjustment for media source number of followers, media source number of tweets, and follow-up time in days between tweet posting and the data collection date. We included media source as a random effect. Results were presented as the estimated counts of likes or retweets for tweets with each HRB compared with either (1) tweets with a different HRB or (2) tweets with no HRB. For ease of interpretation, estimated counts or average marginal effects were used instead of model coefficients. The reported P values indicate the significance of the association between the independent variable and the outcome (number of likes or retweets). Critical values for Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons were calculated by dividing the α level (.05) by the number of hypotheses [6] and were applied to all results (critical value P<.008). All analyses were performed using Stata (version 16; StataCorp).


    Distribution of Tweets by HRBs

    We collected all the tweets that included a hashtag mentioning COVID-19 (in different ways: #coronavirus, #covid-19, #SARS-CoV2, and #2019-nCoV) and any of the HRBs mentioned previously (including Spanish equivalents). That is, the tweet had to mention COVID and at least one HRB to be collected. With these search criteria, we collected 50,415 tweets but excluded 41,863 because they had nothing to do with any HRB. At that time, it was very common to include these types of hashtags in tweets, even though the content of the tweets had nothing to do with health issues, so we decided to exclude them. Of the remaining 8552 tweets, we randomly selected 600 to design the codebook and train the raters. Finally, 7952 were left, and 30% (2386) were randomly selected for manual analysis.

    The number of HRB posts varied considerably among the analyzed mass media accounts (Multimedia Appendix 1). Overall, mass media outlets from Spain showed the largest number of posts. In particular, EFE Noticias, Antena 3, and TVE y La Sexta were the most active media outlets in Spain, whereas CNN, ABC, and New York Post were the most active outlets in the United States. Among the outlets that posted >100 tweets, the New York Post and ABC had the highest proportion of HRB tweets, 78.8% (93/118) and 70.1% (109/154) respectively, whereas TVE and Antena 3 had the lowest proportion, 58.2% (89/153) and 59.4% (95/160) respectively.

    As shown in the flowchart in Figure 1, of the 50,415 tweets collected, 2351 were included in the content analysis, and 1479 of them (62.91%) mentioned at least one HRB. As shown in Table 2, the proportion of tweets mentioning HRBs was significantly different between the 2 countries (P=.006); 60.51% (809/1337) of all tweets related to COVID-19 posted by media outlets from Spain and 66.07% (670/1014) of tweets posted by US outlets contained at least one HRB (Table 2). In both countries, the distribution of tweets across different categories of HRB was heterogeneous. Quarantine or confinement-related tweets accounted for the highest proportion of tweets in both countries, 48.7% (394/809) in Spain and 49.7% (333/670) in the United States), followed by tweets related to masks and social distancing. In contrast, the least frequent HRB categories were disinfecting objects in Spain, 6.9% (56/809), and handwashing in the United States, 9.1% (61/670). There was no significant difference in the proportion of tweets mentioning each HRB between major Spanish and US media outlets.

    Table 2. Descriptive characteristics of the tweets regarding health-related behaviors (HRBs) for the prevention of COVID-19, by categorya and country.

    		CountryP value

    		SpainUnited States
    All COVID-19 tweets, n13371014N/Ab
    Tweets with 0 HRB, n (%)528 (39.5)344 (33.9).006
    Tweets with ≥1 HRB, n (%)809 (60.5)670 (66.1)N/A
    Among COVID-19 tweets with ≥1 HRB, n (%)

    		Quarantine or confinement394 (48.7)333 (49.7).70

    		Masks285 (35.2)227 (33.9).59

    		Social distancing129 (16)84 (12.5).06

    		Handwashing80 (9.9)61 (9.1).61

    		Disinfecting objects56 (6.9)65 (9.7).05

    		Multiple HRBs98 (12.1)70 (10.5).32

    aCategories are not mutually exclusive; tweets with multiple HRBs are counted in those categories as well as in the Multiple HRBs category. Subgroup restricted to tweets with ≥1 HRB and >3 days between tweet posts and data collection date.

    bN/A: not applicable.

    Engagement Metrics by HRB and by Country

    We investigated engagement with tweets posted by Spanish and US media outlets from social media users by analyzing the number of likes and retweets received. Tweets mentioning at least one HRB received a similar number of likes and retweets as those tweets that did not mention an HRB, as shown in Table 3. In both Spain and the United States, the median number of likes received by each tweet was higher than the median number of retweets. Among tweets with at least one HRB, disinfecting objects had a median (IQR) of 197 (63-486) likes and 90 (33-246) retweets, which constitutes the highest for tweets from US media outlets, and it is twice the number achieved by quarantine or confinement-related tweets (Table 3). Among those posted by Spanish media, mask- and handwashing-related tweets had the highest median number of likes (22 and 21, respectively), whereas social distancing-related tweets had the lowest median number of likes. In contrast, all HRBs had a similar median number of retweets (11 or 12).

    Results from mixed Poisson regression analyses in tweets with clustering by media source are presented in Table 4 (Spain) and Table 5 (United States). In adjusted models, tweets posted by mass media outlets from Spain that mentioned social distancing or mentioned disinfecting objects had a significantly lower predicted count of likes compared with tweets mentioning a different HRB (P=.02 and P=.01, respectively) or tweets related to COVID-19 but not mentioning any HRB at all (P=.01 and P=.005, respectively). Tweets mentioning multiple HRBs also had a significantly lower count of predicted likes than tweets mentioning just 1 HRB (P<.001) or did not mention any HRB (P<.001). In respect of retweets, disinfecting objects and tweets mentioning multiple HRBs had a significantly lower predicted number of retweets than tweets mentioning other HRB’s or not mentioning any HRB. Other associations that were not significant (P<.05 are presented in Table 4.

    In regard to tweets posted by US media outlets, in adjusted models those mentioning quarantine or confinement or disinfecting objects had a significantly lower predicted number of likes compared with tweets mentioning a different HRB (P<.001), whereas mask- and handwashing-related tweets had a significantly greater predicted number of likes (P=.04 and P=.02, respectively; Table 5). When compared with tweets related to COVID-19 but not mentioning an HRB, those tweets related to quarantine or confinement or to social distancing had a significantly lower predicted number of likes (P=.01 and P=.005, respectively). With respect to retweets, quarantine or confinement had a significantly lower predicted number of retweets than tweets mentioning other HRB’s (P<.001), whereas those mentioning handwashing had a greater probability of being retweeted (P=.006). When compared with tweets related to COVID-19 not mentioning an HRB, those tweets related to quarantine or confinement, social distancing, or multiple HRBs had a significantly lower predicted number of retweets (P<.001).

    Table 3. Distribution of likes and retweets per category, by country.
    CategorySpainUnited States

    		Value, nLikes, median (IQR)Retweets, median (IQR)Value, nLikes, median (IQR)Retweets, median (IQR)
    All COVID-19 tweets133719 (8-44)11 (5-28)1014109 (36-316)54 (18-137)
    Tweets with 0 HRBa52818 (8-41)12 (5-26)344105 (35-294)57 (19-139)
    Tweets with ≥1 HRB80920 (8-47)11 (5-30)670110 (37-321)51 (18-135)
    Among COVID-19 tweets with ≥1 HRB

    		Quarantine or confinement39417 (7-39)11 (5-28)33388 (31-262)45 (16-102)

    		Masks28522 (10-53)12 (5-35)227127 (41-588)57 (20-183)

    		Social distancing12916 (9-37)11 (5-23)84171 (44-390)62 (17-127)

    		Handwashing8021 (8-56)11 (4-44)61118 (58-447)59 (24-179)

    		Disinfecting objects5618 (10-59)12 (6-48)65197 (63-486)90 (33-246)

    		Multiple HRBs9813 (7-32)11 (4-25)70191 (58-358)66 (28-175)

    aHRB: health-related behavior.

    Table 4. Average predicted number of likes by presence or absence of category in Spain. Results presented as predicted mean (95% CI) from adjusted Poisson models with clustering for media source. Adjustment variables include source number of followers, source number of tweets, and days from tweet posting to data collection date.

    		Tweet with specific HRBa versus tweet with different HRB (n=809)Tweet with specific HRB versus tweet with no HRB

    		Tweet with a different HRB, mean (95% CI)Presence of HRB, mean (95% CI)P valuebModel, nTweet with no HRB, mean (95% CI)Presence of HRB, mean (95% CI)P valueb
    Likes

    		Quarantine or confinement96.8 (42.5-151.1)67.3 (51.4-83.1).1992280.5 (60.1-100.9)67.3 (51.8-79.6).09

    		Masks65.4 (51.4-79.3)115.7 (26.9-204.5).1681379.7 (59.9-99.5)119.1 (31.4-206.7).18

    		Social distancing90.2 (51.2-129.2)43.5 (29.1-57.8).0265780.1 (58.5-101.6)45.3 (32.0-58.6).01

    		Handwashing85.5 (48.8-122.11)62.0 (37.1-86.9).3660882.3 (59.9-104.6)63.2 (43.2-83.2).24

    		Disinfecting objects86.5 (51.5-121.4)44.7 (30.6-58.9).0158482.3 (60.4-104.3)49.2 (32.4-65.9).005

    		Multiple HRBs89.1 (52.8-125.4)37.7 (28.3-47.1)<.00162680.8 (59.5-102.0)38.8 (28.2-49.4)<.001
    Retweets

    		Quarantine or confinement60.1 (20.2-100.0)48.0 (35.8-60.2).4992253.6 (38.7-68.6)45.9 (35.8-55.9).22

    		Masks46.5 (35.7-57.2)69.4 (3.4-135.4).4381352.2 (37.9-66.4)71.5 (5.8-137.3).42

    		Social distancing57.6 (28.3-86.9)36.5 (23.4-49.7).2565752.4 (36.6-68.2)38.0 (24.9-51.1).25

    		Handwashing56.1 (29.2-82.9)41.1 (27.6-54.6).3660854.3 (38.6-69.9)42.2 (30.7-53.7).20

    		Disinfecting objects56.7 (30.8-82.7)30.3 (18.7-42.0).0458454.1 (38.7-69.6)34.5 (20.9-48.2).03

    		Multiple HRBs57.7 (30.6-84.9)29.9 (21.2-38.6).0462653.0 (37.9-68.2)30.8 (21.3-40.4).01

    aHRB: health-related behavior.

    bP value is for the association (independent variable coefficient) between the presence or absence of a category and the number of likes it received.

    Table 5. Average predicted number of likes by presence or absence of category in United States. Results presented as predicted mean (95% CI) from adjusted Poisson models with clustering for media source. Adjustment variables include source number of followers, source number of tweets, and days from tweet posting to data collection date.

    		Tweet with specific HRBa versus tweet with different HRB (n=669)Tweet with specific HRB versus tweet with no HRB

    		Tweet with a different HRB, mean (95% CI)Presence of HRB, mean (95% CI)P valuebModel, nTweet with no HRB, mean (95% CI)Presence of HRB, mean (95% CI)P valueb
    Likes

    		Quarantine or confinement709.2 (404.7-1013.7)331.7 (250.5-414.4)<.001677510.3 (444.9-575.7)351.3 (259.9-442.7).01

    		Masks467.1 (288.3-645.9)620.0 (369.8-870.2).04571523.4 (439.0-607.8)590.0 (333.0-847.0).66

    		Social distancing536.2 (303.7-768.7)395.3 (258.1-532.4).41428540.9 (480.5-601.3)398.2 (314.9-481.5).005

    		Handwashing448.3 (347.4-551.0)1154.6 (46.9-2262.4).02405515.3 (427.5-603.1)1357.8 (90.2-2625.4).06

    		Disinfecting objects542.7 (335.5-750.0)305.8 (250.1-361.5)<.001409539.9 (478.5-601.3)306.3 (137.3-475.4).06

    		Multiple HRBs535.4 (319.4-751.3)364.6 (273.5-455.7).20414524.0 (458.9-589.2)393.0 (282.8-503.1).08
    Retweets

    		Quarantine or confinement263.4 (143.0-383.9)120.7 (83.5-157.9)<.001677223.1 (197.2-249.1)129.3 (89.7-169.0)<.001

    		Masks177.8 (102.8-252.8)212.8 (119.9-305.7).26571226.6 (192.7-260.4)201.1 (104.2-298.1).68

    		Social distancing198.4 (108.4-288.4)127.8 (94.8-160.8).18428234.2 (208.2-260.3)122 (102.7-142.8)<.001

    		Handwashing159.6 (115.8-203.5)463.0 (30.7-895.2).006405224.9 (190.6-259.2)525.4 (60.3-990.5).08

    		Disinfecting objects192.3 (110.0-274.7)160.1 (134.5-185.7).32409233.3 (206.9-259.8)153.9 (79.9-227.8).10

    		Multiple HRBs195.8 (111.3-280.2)134.3 (110.5-158.2).12414228.3 (200.2-256.4)141.1 (111.0-171.1)<.001

    aHRB: health-related behavior.

    bP value is for the association (independent variable coefficient) between the presence or absence of a category and the number of likes it received.


    Principal Findings

    In this study, we found that major media outlets from Spain and the United States, when posting information on Twitter related to COVID-19, mentioned an HRB in the majority of their tweets, both focusing on quarantine or confinement and masks. Twitter users from both countries showed similar engagement in tweets mentioning an HRB compared with those that did not mention an HRB. Remarkably, the engagement of users following media outlets from Spain was more equally distributed among different HRBs. Furthermore, in Spanish tweets, none of the HRB tweets had a higher probability of being liked or retweeted than others. However, tweets mentioning handwashing or masks had greater probabilities of being liked than tweets mentioning a different HRB or not mentioning any of them when posted from US media outlets. Finally, we observed that media outlets from Spain differed in their Twitter posting patterns quantitatively and qualitatively from US media outlets.

    It has previously been shown that entertainment media and social media play a critical role in the behaviors of individuals and have the potential to influence awareness, which is important because adhering to health recommendations is considered a very relevant element for the prevention of COVID-19 infection and overcoming the pandemic [23-25]. Certain health recommendations have been changed since the outbreak of the pandemic [26]. However, majority of health professionals and institutions have promoted some HRBs since the early stages of the pandemic. Social media platforms such as Twitter are increasingly being leveraged by researchers for surveillance and to explore complex social issues, such as perceptions of the public on HRBs, including masks, handwashing, social distancing, and vaccines [27-29]. Furthermore, recognized socially influential agents, such as media outlets or politicians, use Twitter as a dissemination tool for their information, including COVID-19–related news [30]. Social media has become the main source of COVID-19–related information for many people [31]. When media outlets share information, their influence is enormous, particularly in situations such as a pandemic [32,33]. Thus, it is important to analyze the impact of this information on society because exposure to misinformation has been associated with psychological distress, poorer COVID-19 knowledge, and lower adoption of preventive behaviors [34].

    Communication Media and HRBs

    Our data show that the number of tweets posted by major media outlets from Spain and the United States regarding HRBs is high overall. Interestingly, the number of posts was not homogeneously distributed among the different categories, with quarantine or confinement and masks receiving the highest number of tweets. These results point in the same direction as previous reports, which also found that a great variety of COVID-19–related human behaviors have been discussed on social media, with masks and sheltering in place prevailing over others [35,36]. In fact, Americans initially posted about China, but once COVID-19 became a reality in the United States, their social media posts started to focus on US-centered issues, such as lockdown or stay-at-home recommendations [37]. Nonetheless, those following Twitter accounts of major US media outlets were more interested in handwashing, whereas those following Spanish outlets did not show such a preference.

    Several reasons may explain the differences found in the priorities or interests of the media and Twitter users, as well as the differences found between users following media outlets from Spain and the United States. First, it may be in the best interest of media outlets and politicians to focus on issues related to masks (shortage, logistics organization of distribution, legislation, etc) rather than on promoting less controversial matters such as handwashing. Second, the great mediatic and social impact generated by quarantines and confinements in comparison with other measures established to prevent the spread of COVID-19 may explain why this HRB, in particular, is so present in tweets posted by media outlets [38,39]. Third, wide sectors of society, such as political parties in the opposition, may push the media to speak and try to generate buzz around quarantine or confinement and masks rather than promoting healthy habits that are not controversial, such as handwashing. Fourth, many authorities may be especially active in promoting confinement through press news because of its implications. In fact, politicians’ announcements related to confinements and quarantines have been disseminated through media outlets on social media accounts. In addition, several studies have suggested that political parties and big companies have a strong influence on the agenda-setting of media outlets and on the information that they distribute. All of these facts may have contributed to our observed prominence of quarantine or confinement and mask tweets, as compared with handwashing, despite the fact that the latter generated more engagement among Twitter users.

    In our study, differences were found in the probability of tweets being liked or retweeted according to each HRB. However, it is relevant to note that all HRB tweets achieved a median number of likes and retweets higher than those found in previous articles for tweets posted by US media outlets on diseases with high prevalence and morbidity (such as cancer, Parkinson, depression, and osteoporosis) or on tweets related to other preventive medical measures, such as contraceptives [21,40]. Moreover, it is important to note that these differences in the probabilities of a tweet being liked or retweeted were more pronounced in tweets posted by US media outlets. One possible explanation could be that US media outlets not only have a greater number of followers but also a more international audience. This greater diversity among followers may contribute to greater polarization in their interests. Nevertheless, cultural differences among countries regarding public perceptions and preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic have been previously described [41]. Furthermore, the relative weight assigned to each HRB by the media outlets, as defined by the percentage of tweets received, was not related to the retweets and likes generated by Twitter users. That is, the HRB that gathered the most attention was handwashing, whereas tweets mentioning multiple HRBs did not generate much attention despite prestigious studies showing strong evidence of each of the HRB mentioned. This finding could be explained by the fact that tweets are short in nature and may be easier to capture user’s attention if only focusing on a specific HRB. In addition, Twitter users might have been prone to promoting handwashing, because the benefits of doing so are strongly supported by scientific data and have never been questioned. Furthermore, handwashing, in contrast to masks or quarantine or confinement, has no political connotations, thus allowing Twitter users to share handwashing posts without publicly declaring their political preferences [42]. Moreover, tweets mentioning disinfecting objects despite President Trump’s declarations in this regard and all the controversies generated had lower probabilities of being retweeted or liked than tweets mentioning a different HRB.

    In addition, we analyzed the proportion of tweets posted by each of the media outlets analyzed, mentioning each HRB. Our data showed that most media outlets, with only 1 exception, focused on quarantine or confinement and masks. Thus, bias in the information related to HRB was not detected. This may indicate that media outlets share common interests. Nonetheless, it is important to highlight that certain differences were observed between them.

    The important role that media outlets play in generating popular opinion is well known. Thus, our results suggest that health promotion is not as relevant as generating controversy for media outlets. This is worrying given that measures such as washing hands or maintaining physical distancing are as important as wearing masks or complying with quarantine or confinement, despite the latter being the object of more controversy. The adoption of all HRB is desirable to prevent COVID-19 infection. However, according to our results, controversial measures attract more attention from the media but not from Twitter users.

    Limitations

    It should be noted that this study has limitations. First, the relevance of Twitter as a social interest marker remains controversial. In addition, the lack of data regarding the geographic location of Twitter users is a limitation in interpreting engagement. Second, the analyzed media outlets do not necessarily reflect the posting pattern of all the press and might have a different set of priorities. Third, our Twitter data were collected according to our selected keywords; thus, we might have missed tweets using different keywords despite discussing the same topic. Fourth, content analysis implies a certain degree of subjectivity. To address this issue, the study comprised a series of steps: initial review, the design of a codebook through a comprehensive process, and the testing of a coder agreement.

    Conclusions

    To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare media outlet posts related to COVID-19 HRBs from 2 different countries. Media outlets provided more content related to quarantine or confinement and masks, whereas Twitter users, especially those following US media outlets, showed greater engagement with handwashing. Moreover, tweets mentioning multiple HRBs did not result in as much engagement from the Twitter community as those mentioning only 1 HRB. We believe that this finding may have been influenced by the nature of Twitter. Understanding health communication on social media is necessary to design appropriate public health campaigns that might contribute to reducing the rates of contagion and ultimately overcome the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies could expand the current research by assessing the impact of media publications on the evolution of the pandemic.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was partially supported by grants from the Fondo de Investigación de la Seguridad Social, the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI18/01726; Spain), the Programa de Actividades de I+D de la Comunidad de Madrid en Biomedicina (B2017/BMD-3804; Madrid, Spain), and Helekulani SL.

    Disclaimer

    The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

    Authors' Contributions

    ART, VP-S, and MAA-M were the principal contributors to research design, coordination of data analysis, and manuscript preparation. MAA-M specifically coordinated data acquisition. MAA-M and FS were tweet coders, contributing to codebook development, training, and analysis of the tweets. ERH conducted and reported the statistical analyses. MA-M contributed to the manuscript as a reviewer. ART was the main supervisor in all phases of the project, with special involvement in the study design, interpretation of data, and manuscript preparation.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Number of tweets by media outlet, by country. Results presented as n (%) of health-related behavior tweets.

    DOCX File , 28 KB
    1. Al-Dmour H, Masa'deh R, Salman A, Abuhashesh M, Al-Dmour R. Influence of social media platforms on public health protection against the COVID-19 pandemic via the mediating effects of public health awareness and behavioral changes: integrated model. J Med Internet Res. Aug 19, 2020;22(8):e19996. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Pennycook G, McPhetres J, Zhang Y, Lu JG, Rand DG. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychol Sci. Jul 2020;31(7):770-780. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Daughton AR, Paul MJ. Identifying protective health behaviors on twitter: observational study of travel advisories and Zika virus. J Med Internet Res. May 13, 2019;21(5):e13090. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. Nov 29, 2010;5(11):e14118. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Nagar R, Yuan Q, Freifeld CC, Santillana M, Nojima A, Chunara R, et al. A case study of the New York City 2012-2013 influenza season with daily geocoded Twitter data from temporal and spatiotemporal perspectives. J Med Internet Res. Oct 20, 2014;16(10):e236. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Skarpa PE, Garoufallou E. Information seeking behavior and COVID-19 pandemic: a snapshot of young, middle aged and senior individuals in Greece. Int J Med Inform. Jun 2021;150:104465. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E. Tracking social media discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic: development of a public coronavirus Twitter data set. JMIR Public Health Surveill. May 29, 2020;6(2):e19273. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Tsao SF, Chen H, Tisseverasinghe T, Yang Y, Li L, Butt ZA. What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review. Lancet Digit Health. Mar 2021;3(3):e175-e194. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Yousuf H, Corbin J, Sweep G, Hofstra M, Scherder E, van Gorp E, et al. Association of a public health campaign about coronavirus disease 2019 promoted by news media and a social influencer with self-reported personal hygiene and physical distancing in the Netherlands. JAMA Netw Open. Jul 01, 2020;3(7):e2014323. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Fernández-Torres MJ, Almansa-Martínez A, Chamizo-Sánchez R. Infodemic and fake news in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Feb 12, 2021;18(4):1781. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Hsiang S, Allen D, Annan-Phan S, Bell K, Bolliger I, Chong T, et al. The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. Aug 2020;584(7820):262-267. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Lin A, Vittinghoff E, Olgin J, Peyser N, Aung S, Joyce S, et al. Predictors of incident SARS-CoV-2 infections in an international prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. Sep 21, 2021;11(9):e052025. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, Kern ML, Park G, Labarthe DR, Merchant RM, et al. Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychol Sci. Feb 2015;26(2):159-169. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Nguyen QC, Meng H, Li D, Kath S, McCullough M, Paul D, et al. Social media indicators of the food environment and state health outcomes. Public Health. Jul 2017;148:120-128. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Nguyen QC, Brunisholz KD, Yu W, McCullough M, Hanson HA, Litchman ML, et al. Twitter-derived neighborhood characteristics associated with obesity and diabetes. Sci Rep. Nov 27, 2017;7(1):16425. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Gore RJ, Diallo S, Padilla J. You are what you tweet: connecting the geographic variation in America's obesity rate to Twitter content. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0133505. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Ireland ME, Chen Q, Schwartz HA, Ungar LH, Albarracin D. Action tweets linked to reduced county-level HIV prevalence in the United States: online messages and structural determinants. AIDS Behav. Jun 2016;20(6):1256-1264. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Chandrasekaran R, Mehta V, Valkunde T, Moustakas E. Topics, trends, and sentiments of tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic: temporal infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res. Oct 23, 2020;22(10):e22624. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Viguria I, Alvarez-Mon MA, Llavero-Valero M, Asunsolo Del Barco A, Ortuño F, Alvarez-Mon M. Eating disorder awareness campaigns: thematic and quantitative analysis using Twitter. J Med Internet Res. Jul 14, 2020;22(7):e17626. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Social media management with Tweet Binder. TweetBinder blog. URL: https://www.tweetbinder.com/blog/ [accessed 2023-07-14]
    21. Alvarez-Mon M, Asunsolo Del Barco A, Lahera G, Quintero J, Ferre F, Pereira-Sanchez V, et al. Increasing interest of mass communication media and the general public in the distribution of tweets about mental disorders: observational study. J Med Internet Res. May 28, 2018;20(5):e205. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Pereira-Sanchez V, Alvarez-Mon M, Asunsolo Del Barco A, Alvarez-Mon M, Teo A. Exploring the extent of the Hikikomori phenomenon on Twitter: mixed methods study of western language tweets. J Med Internet Res. May 29, 2019;21(5):e14167. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Merchant RM, Lurie N. Social media and emergency preparedness in response to novel coronavirus. JAMA. May 26, 2020;323(20):2011-2012. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Yousuf H, Narula J, Zwetsloot PP, Hofstra M, de Levita A, Scherder E, et al. Using entertainment to improve lifestyles and health. Lancet. Jul 13, 2019;394(10193):119-120. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Pan A, Liu L, Wang C, Guo H, Hao X, Wang Q, et al. Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA. May 19, 2020;323(19):1915-1923. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Feng S, Shen C, Xia N, Song W, Fan M, Cowling BJ. Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Respir Med. May 2020;8(5):434-436. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Kwok SW, Vadde SK, Wang G. Tweet topics and sentiments relating to COVID-19 vaccination among Australian Twitter users: machine learning analysis. J Med Internet Res. May 19, 2021;23(5):e26953. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Lwin MO, Lu J, Sheldenkar A, Schulz PJ, Shin W, Gupta R, et al. Global sentiments surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: analysis of Twitter trends. JMIR Public Health Surveill. May 22, 2020;6(2):e19447. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Zhou X, Song Y, Jiang H, Wang Q, Qu Z, Zhou X, et al. Comparison of public responses to containment measures during the initial outbreak and resurgence of COVID-19 in China: infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. Apr 05, 2021;23(4):e26518. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Ahmed W, Vidal-Alaball J, Lopez Segui F, Moreno-Sánchez PA. A social network analysis of tweets related to masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Nov 07, 2020;17(21):8235. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Zhao Y, Xu S, Wang L, Huang Y, Xu Y, Xu Y, et al. Concerns about information regarding COVID-19 on the internet: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. Nov 09, 2020;22(11):e20487. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Liu PL. COVID-19 information seeking on digital media and preventive behaviors: the mediation role of worry. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. Oct 2020;23(10):677-682. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Shimizu K. 2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism. Lancet. Feb 29, 2020;395(10225):685-686. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Lee JJ, Kang KA, Wang MP, Zhao SZ, Wong JY, O'Connor S, et al. Associations between COVID-19 misinformation exposure and belief with COVID-19 knowledge and preventive behaviors: cross-sectional online study. J Med Internet Res. Nov 13, 2020;22(11):e22205. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Daughton AR, Shelley CD, Barnard M, Gerts D, Watson Ross C, Crooker I, et al. Mining and validating social media data for COVID-19-related human behaviors between January and July 2020: infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. May 25, 2021;23(5):e27059. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Abd-Alrazaq A, Alhuwail D, Househ M, Hamdi M, Shah Z. Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res. Apr 21, 2020;22(4):e19016. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Valdez D, Ten Thij M, Bathina K, Rutter LA, Bollen J. Social media insights into US mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal analysis of twitter data. J Med Internet Res. Dec 14, 2020;22(12):e21418. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Xue J, Chen J, Chen C, Zheng C, Li S, Zhu T. Public discourse and sentiment during the COVID 19 pandemic: using Latent Dirichlet Allocation for topic modeling on Twitter. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0239441. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Xue J, Chen J, Hu R, Chen C, Zheng C, Su Y, et al. Twitter discussions and emotions about the COVID-19 pandemic: machine learning approach. J Med Internet Res. Nov 25, 2020;22(11):e20550. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Alvarez-Mon MA, Donat-Vargas C, Llavero-Valero M, Gea A, Alvarez-Mon M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, et al. Analysis of media outlets on women's health: thematic and quantitative analyses using Twitter. Front Public Health. 2021;9:644284. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Bowman L, Kwok KO, Redd R, Yi Y, Ward H, Wei WI, et al. Comparing public perceptions and preventive behaviors during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res. Mar 08, 2021;23(3):e23231. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Lang J, Erickson WW, Jing-Schmidt Z. #MaskOn! #MaskOff! digital polarization of mask-wearing in the United States during COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250817. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    API: application programming interface
    HRB: health-related behavior

    Edited by T Mackey; submitted 20.10.22; peer-reviewed by N Sigalo, C Chen; comments to author 10.01.23; revised version received 17.02.23; accepted 30.05.23; published 22.08.23.

    Copyright

    ©Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Victor Pereira-Sanchez, Elizabeth R Hooker, Facundo Sanchez, Melchor Alvarez-Mon, Alan R Teo. Originally published in JMIR Infodemiology (https://infodemiology.jmir.org), 22.08.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Infodemiology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://infodemiology.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.